![]() T R A N S C R I P T |
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 |
![]() |
The structure of money, its tangible exchangeability, makes it seem as if goods are more similar materially, and, though distant, attainable, than they may actually be. So with digital computation, the specificity of one form of experience, voice, for example, is dissolved as one experience is translated into another, voice into picture. This operation seems to correspond with a sense that things and ideas never stand alone, but somehow relate to each other, and that there may even be ways of connecting seemingly different or opposite concepts (such as political positions). Despite this alchemy, I don't think that this operation by itself disturbs our senses of identity in contemporary culture. This is because what I have been describing has been a conservative operation. In other words, in stating that a form is translatable, through digital computation, into other forms, I have taken for granted that our original voice recording will have remained preserved. Untouched. Those of you familiar with today's multimedia tools such as Adobe's Photoshop are also familiar with the "Undo" facility. Identity is preserved by way of duplication. One changes a "working copy" of an image rather than the saved version. |
![]() |
  | back | next Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |